Webinar: From Idea to Acceptance: How to Submit a Winning Annual Meeting Session Proposal

Have an idea for a session at the 2027 AAM Annual Meeting & MuseumExpo?

Join this interactive webinar to learn what reviewers are really looking for and how to craft a proposal that stands out.

We’ll cover everything from writing a compelling session title to clearly defining audience takeaways, sharing common mistakes to avoid, and walking through a live proposal review to show how small changes can strengthen your submission.

Whether you’re submitting for the first time or looking to improve your approach, you’ll leave with practical tips to help turn your idea into a successful proposal.

📅 Thursday, August 20, 2026

🕑 2:00–3:00 PM ET

💻 Online

👉 Register today: https://www.aam-us.org/event/from-idea-to-acceptance-how-to-submit-a-winning-annual-meeting-session-proposal/

New Issue: Archives: The Journal of the British Records Association

Archives: The Journal of the British Records Association 60, no. 2 (2026)
(subscription)

Articles

THE ASSOCIATION OF PERFORMING ARTS COLLECTIONS
Erin Lee

THEATRE ROYAL, NOTTINGHAM: HERITAGE MURAL COMMISSION WITH HANDMADE THEATRE
Georgina Donohue

CREATING TRANSFORMATION: CO-CURATING COLLECTIONS WITH ARTISTS, PEOPLE AND PLACES
Robyn Greenwood

THE MAURICE BOND LECTURE 2024. PLACING ARCHIVES: THE VICTORIA COUNTY HISTORY AND ARCHIVAL LANDSCAPES
Adam Chapman

APPARITIONAL BLACKNESS: NORTHAMPTONSHIRE’S STUBBORN PHANTOMS
Tré Ventour-Griffiths

Review

David Crouch, ed., The Metham Family Cartulary: Reconstructed from Antiquarian Transcripts
Nicholas Vincent

New Issue: American Archivist

American Archivist 89, no. 1 (2026)
(partial open access)

From the Editor
What is the Problem?
Amy Cooper Cary

Presidential Address
Archival Chaos or Archival Community?: A Charge for Change, Equity, and Openness
Derek T. Mosley

Special Section on User Experience (UX) and Archives Introduction
Faith Charlton, Alison Clemens, Betts Coup, and Shaun Ellis

Building UX Capacity in Archives: A Practical Maturity Model
Hanna Sistrunk

“Why Can’t I See That?”: Evaluating the Impact of Access Restrictions on Archival Researchers
Veronica Denison, DiAnna Hemsath, Elizabeth Russell, Ashlyn Velte, and Katrina Windon

Beyond the Reading Room: Exploring the Motivations and Behaviors of Online Archival Users
Chela Scott Weber, Lesley A. Langa, and Lynn Silipigni Connaway

“For the Good of the User”: Harmful Content Mediation Insights from Princeton University Library’s Focus Group Study
Faith Charlton, Christa Ciadella, Shaun Ellis, and Amy C. Vo

Creating Space in ASpace for New Perspectives: Notes from a Year-Long UX Assessment of the ArchivesSpace PUI
Benn Joseph, Dana Lamparello, Kelsey O’Connell, and Frank Sweis

Stronger Together: A Heuristic Evaluation of Content Notices on Digital Collections Websites
Theresa Berger

Archival Motivations, Barriers, and Recommendations from Indigenous Community-based Researchers: Findings from a Mixed-Methods Survey
Diana E. Marsh, Danielle Davis, Joshua A. Bell, Ugoma Smoke, Dorene O’Hara, and Maria F. Vivar-Guzman

Articles

The Struggle of Institutional Recordkeeping: A Case Study Examining American Advisor Records from the Vietnam War
Eliot Wilczek

All the Freaks We’ve Saved: The Louisville Underground Music Archive in Retrospect and Comparison
Elizabeth E. Reilly, Caroline Daniels, and Heather Fox

International Perspectives

Perfecting Digital Archiving: A Comparative Study
Michal R. Rubin, Rinat Stapler, and Alexandra Wolloch-Grandelevskaya

Naming the Fragment: Documentary Forms of Newspaper Clippings
José Francisco Guelfi Campos

Reviews

From Historical Legacies to Future Frameworks: Recent Scholarship in Archives
Rose Buchanan and Stephanie Luke

Access to Special Collections and Archives: Bridging Theory and Practice
Gab Alderete-Cruz

From Interrogation to Integration: Centering Social Justice in Special Collections, Archives, and Preservation
Kate Burns

Digital Humanities and Libraries and Archives in Religious Studies: An Introduction
Adam Stokes

Visualizing History’s Fragments: A Computational Approach to Humanistic Research
Laila Hussein Moustafa

After Disruption: A Future for Cultural Memory
Lori Podolsky

Stories on Skin: A Librarian’s Guide to Tattoos as Personal Archives
Courtney Marie Gillie

The Book Censor’s Library
Amanda Greenwood

CFP: Restorative Justice in Heritage Studies and Archaeology book series

Restorative justice in heritage and archaeology embraces initiatives for reconciliation of past societal transgressions using processes that are multivocal, dialogic, historically informed, community based, negotiated, and transformative. This series presents works that promote the active and often unconventional ways that archaeologists, historians, and heritage scholars are contributing to a process of remaking. Our authors work to define and illuminate the best practices for restorative justice in these fields and to identify how practitioners and their collaborators are working to redress, reconcile, and remake contemporary society.

Series Editors: Nedra K. Lee, PhD, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts; Richard Paul Benjamin, PhD, University of Liverpool; and Christopher Fennell, PhD, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Learn More: We welcome proposals for single-authored, co-authored, and edited volumes. Interested in proposing a book for this series? Contact one of us: Nedra.Lee@umb.eduRichard.Benjamin@liverpool.ac.ukcfennell@illinois.edu. General guidelines for authors are available from Routledge Press (Taylor & Francis). Routledge offers flexible approaches to publishing in print, ebook, and open-access formats.

We have multiple volumes published and in process, including —

“Grappling with Monuments of Oppression: Moving from Analysis to Activism”

“Combating Oppression with New Commemorations”  

“Monuments, Statues, and Commemorations of Women”

“Landscapes of Care: Heart-Centered Practice in Historical Archaeology”

Join our initiative! You can follow these projects through our website, and on social media.

http://faculty.las.illinois.edu/cfennell/RestorativeJusticeInHeritageStudies&ArchaeologyBookSeriesOverview.htm

https://www.routledge.com/Restorative-Justice-in-Heritage-Studies-and-Archaeology/book-series/RJHSA

Kind regards,
Chris Fennell

Contact Information

Christopher Fennell

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Contact Email

cfennell@illinois.edu

CfP: Mapping the Extremes – Polar Cartography

Texas Map Society Fall Meeting 2026

Mapping the Extremes –  Polar Cartography

Oct 3, 2026 – Central Library, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas

The Texas Map Society invites paper proposals for its Fall Meeting, which will focus on polar mapping. This year, we are thrilled to host our meeting in conjunction with the 15th Biennial Virginia Garrett Lectures on the History of Cartography, Oct 1-2, 2026. Their theme this year is “Frozen Frontiers: 500 Years of Mapping Antarctica”.  The lecture series also marks the opening of a new Special Collections exhibit, “Frozen Frontiers: 500 Years of Mapping Antarctica,” which showcases Antarctic maps, books, and prints donated to UTA Libraries by former NBC 5 Senior Meteorologist and Texas Map Society board member – and longtime Editor of The Neatline – David Finfrock. 

We invite submissions detailing innovative mapping of the Arctic and Antarctic. We seek to bring together map collectors, historians of cartography, marine scientists, geographers, archivists, digital humanities scholars, and others to explore the polar regions as a contested and evolving space.

We welcome paper proposals on, but not limited to, the role of maps in colonial claims; historical and modern methods of mapping the Arctic and Antarctic; environmental humanities; Indigenous geographies; the recovery of non-Western spatial knowledge and navigation traditions; borders and jurisdictions; and digital humanities projects.   

As we are the Texas Map Society, we always welcome papers on the mapping of Texas, map collections featuring Texas, and other local mapping, regardless of theme.

Submission Requirements

We welcome proposals for individual 20-minute papers or pre-constituted panels.

  • Individual Abstracts: 250–300 words.
  • Panel Proposals: A 150-word session description plus short abstracts for each presenter.
  • Short Biography: A 100-word biography can include relevant publications or projects.

Deadlines

  • Proposals Due: August 20
  • Acceptance Notification: the first week of September

Contact Information

Please submit all materials in a single PDF directly to TMS VP Lydia Towns at Lydia.towns@sfasu.edu

Contact Email

Lydia.towns@sfasu.edu

CfP for INTERFACE Issue 31: Rethinking Materiality in an Age of Digital Presence

Call for Papers for Issue 31 (December 2026)

Submission Deadline: October 31, 2026

Guest Editors:

Paweł Piszczatowski  (University of Warsaw)

Helga Müllneritsch (National Taiwan University)

Rethinking Materiality in an Age of Digital Presence

 “If matter itself is lively, then not only is the difference between subjects and objects minimized, but the status of the shared materiality of all things is elevated. All bodies become more than mere objects, as the thing-powers of resistance and protean agency are brought into sharper relief” (Bennett, Vibrant Matter, 2010, p. 13).

Over the past two decades, the concept of materiality has undergone a profound transformation across the humanities. Approaches such as New Materialism, Posthumanism, and Object-Oriented Ontology have challenged anthropocentric models of thought by emphasizing the vitality, agency, and relationality of both living and non-living matter. Rather than treating objects as passive entities defined solely by human perception and use, these perspectives foreground the active role of material forms in shaping human experience, cultural practices, and historical processes.

Yet questions surrounding materiality are far from new. Throughout history, philosophers, artists, writers, and cultural thinkers have explored the relationship between human beings and the material world. In the late eighteenth century, for instance, the German philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder argued that “sight reveals merely shapes, but touch alone reveals bodies” (Herder, Sculpture, 2002, p. 35), emphasizing tactility and embodiment as fundamental conditions of human experience. His reflections acquire renewed significance in the present moment, when increasing aspects of social interaction, creativity, labour, and intimacy are mediated through digital technologies.

The emergence of artificial intelligence, virtual environments, and digitally mediated relationships raises new questions about the status of the material in contemporary life. While digital technologies may appear to distance human experience from physical presence, they remain deeply embedded in material infrastructures, embodied practices, and affective relations. The rise of AI companions, virtual therapists, and synthetic forms of intimacy challenges established distinctions between human and non-human, physical and virtual, object and subject.

This special issue seeks to explore how materiality has been imagined, experienced, represented, and transformed across different historical periods and cultural contexts. Rather than understanding the digital age as a departure from material existence, we invite contributions that examine how new technologies, philosophical developments, artistic practices, and social transformations reshape our understanding of matter itself. How have concepts of materiality evolved across time? How do objects acquire meaning through their movement, preservation, and transformation? How might digital and technological developments alter, rather than diminish, our relationship with embodied existence?

We welcome interdisciplinary contributions from literary studies, history, philosophy, cultural studies, media studies, anthropology, art history, and related fields. Submissions may address any historical period or theoretical approach within literary and cultural contexts.

Possible topics include, but are not limited to:

Literary, Historical, and Philosophical Foundations

  • Philosophical approaches to being, matter, embodiment, and the material world
  • Historical transformations of concepts of materiality across cultures
  • The global circulation and intercultural adaptation of material concepts and practices
  • Handwriting as a form of embodied expression and the material trace of the self
  • Drawing, sketching, and visual practices as material expressions of thought
  • Material objects and their meanings across time and space
  • Objects as carriers of memory, emotion, and historical experience
  • Matter as palimpsest: accumulated layers of personal and collective histories

 Material Practices, Technology, and Intimacy

  • The movement of material practices across cultures and historical periods
  • Traditional Chinese Medicine in Europe and the transnational circulation of healing practices
  • Material and spiritual connections in practices such as ancestor worship
  • Bodies, prosthetics, and technological extensions
  • Understanding of materiality as a property of discrete objects or emerging through dynamic networks of human, non-human, and technological relations
  • Ethical questions surrounding AI-human interaction
  • Artificial intelligence, emotional attachment, and new forms of intimacy
  • Reshaping of our understanding of embodiment, relationality, and presence through digital objects, virtual environments, and algorithmic systems

 Cultural Representations and Imaginaries

  • Literary representations of artificial consciousness and synthetic emotions
  • Cinematic portrayals of human-machine relationships
  • Science fiction and speculative explorations of synthetic life
  • Representations of human and non-human agency
  • The role of objects and technologies in shaping identity and memory
  • Artistic engagements with virtuality, embodiment, and material presence

INTERFACE also invites papers not related to the Special Topic which will be published in a dedicated General Topic Section.

Papers should be submitted online at http://interface.org.tw/ no later than October 31, 2026; and should include an abstract of no more than 250 words.

All potential authors should consult our website for Author Guidelines (http://interface.org.tw/index.php/if/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions)

Contact Information

Paweł Piszczatowski  (University of Warsaw)

Helga Müllneritsch (National Taiwan University)

Contact Email

hmuellneritsch@ntu.edu.tw

URL

https://interface.org.tw/index.php/if/pages/view/CallforPapers31

GLAM Bookworms Book Club – Sept. 16

Please join us for the next G.L.A.M. Bookworms book club meeting on Wednesday, September 16 at 7pm (EDT) when we’ll discuss THE CARTOGRAPHERS by Peng Shepherd.  RSVP for Zoom link: info@wolfsonarchives.org

THE CARTOGRAPHERS by Peng Shepherd

Nell Young, a talented cartographer who, after being exiled from her job at the New York Public Library, discovers a mysterious map among her deceased father’s possessions. As she delves into its secrets and its link to her father’s murder, she uncovers a world where maps hold extraordinary powers, leading her on a journey filled with mystery and danger.

If you have any questions or would like additional information, please let me know!

Thank you.

Regards,

Lou Kramer

Miami Dade College’s Wolfson Archives

lkramer1@mdc.edu

CFP: Journal of New Librarianship

The Journal of New Librarianship is celebrating its 10th anniversary in the Spring 2027 issue. We invite submissions where authors reflect upon the last decade of librarianship and critically examine the changes, trends, and challenges of the past and the excitement, innovation, or concerns for the future. We are accepting submissions for Peer-Reviewed Articles, New Generation of Librarianship Column, Innovations in Librarianship Column, and Op-Eds or Essays. Authors who submit for Peer-Review, Op-Eds, and Essays may be asked to review other authors’ submissions, but is not required for submission. 

  • Peer-Reviewed articles: Although longer works may be considered, 3,000–6,000-word manuscripts are most suitable.
  • Columns, Op-Eds, and Essays: 1,500–3,000 words.
    • New Generation of Librarianship Column (1,500 words)
      • This column examines the issues faced by the new generation of librarians, across all fields of librarianship. “New generation” is broadly conceived to include any person who is new to the field, regardless of age, background, etc. Topics could include, but are not limited to: efforts advancing accessibility, equity, diversity, and inclusion; experiences of marginalized librarians; critical librarianship; international experiences and perspectives; succession planning, hiring, and retention; experiences and impact of early- and second-career librarians who have recently joined the profession. For potential inclusion in the Spring 2027 anniversary series, please consider these themes within the context of the CFP prompt above.
    • Innovations in Librarianship Column (1,500 words)
      • This column seeks authors who wish to share the details of how they have realized these innovations, defined as an “idea, practice, or object that is perceived as new by an individual or other unit of adoption” within their own praxis.For potential inclusion in the Spring 2027 anniversary series, please consider these themes within the context of the CFP prompt above.

JoNL is a free, open-access journal committed to equity, diversity, and plurality of opinions. In addition to making scholarship freely accessible to all readers, the journal publishes works created by authors from all backgrounds, drawn from all types of libraries and information centers. A central aim of the journal is to challenge long-held assumptions within the library and information science (LIS) field. To this end, authors are encouraged to submit works that meaningfully interrogate structures and practices to engender and advance a sense of equity, fairness, and justice within librarianship.

New librarianship commands a call to action and the JoNL provides an outlet that mixes both traditional and emerging forms of scholarly and professional communications that forge innovative paths shared and led by the LIS profession. Our goal is to provide a publishing venue for innovative and interdisciplinary scholarship that extends beyond the narrow scope of existing LIS journals.

JoNL uses an electronic submission and reviews process through OJS. See our website for additional information about the Review Process and our AI Policy. Submissions must be submitted using the preformatted JoNL Manuscript Template.

Key Dates:

Submission Deadline: October 1, 2026

Notification of Acceptance for Peer Review: October 18, 2026

Return of Peer Review manuscripts: November 23, 2026

Submission deadline for revisions: December 13, 2026

Publication: Spring 2027 

Contact:

Claire DL. Dunker, Communications Editor, newlibsjournal@gmail.com

CFP: Museums in times of Polarization: Dialogues, Complex Pasts, and the Ethical Construction of Shared Futures

Call for Papers
ICOFOM Annual Symposium 2026
19 November, 26 November, and 3 December 2026
Museums in Times of Polarization: Dialogue, Difficult Pasts, and the Ethical Construction of Shared Futures

The ICOFOM Annual Symposium 2026 will be held entirely online, through three live webinars taking place on 19 November, 26 November, and 3 December 2026.

Within this framework, contributors are invited to address—though are by no means limited to—the following themes, which will be explored across the webinars:

Webinar 1. Museums in a Polarized World

Webinar 2. Negotiating Difficult Pasts: Memory, Representation, and Ethical Responsibility

Webinar 3. Imagining the Museum of Tomorrow

Important Dates

  • Call for Papers opens: 20 July 2026
  • Submission deadline: 30 August 2026
  • Notification of acceptance: Second half of September 2026

Submission Guidelines in brief:

The Organizing Committee invites proposals under two participation formats, depending on the nature and scope of the contribution:

1. Individual or Joint Papers (15-minute presentations)

2. Quick Fire Presentations (5–7 minutes)

Contributions must consist of the full paper, with a maximum length of 12,000 characters, including notes and references, in accordance with the ICOFOM submission guidelines.

Read all submission guidelines and the full Call for Papers before applying here:

Call for papers (English version)

For additional information or enquiries, please contact:
secretary.icofom@icom.museum

CFP: Women and Cartography from the Middle Ages to the 20th century

SYMPOSIUM at Université Le Havre Normandie — 12–13 March 2027

Organisation : Comité Français de Cartographie, Université Le Havre Normandie (Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences), Identités et Cultures Research Group, Le Havre Heritage Library

In partnership with : Institut universitaire de France, Bibliothèque nationale de France, EPHE (Histara), CNRS (Laboratoire de médiévistique occidentale de Paris)

RATIONALE

This conference sets out to re-examine the place of women in the making, circulation, and reception of cartographic knowledge up to the 20th century, taking into account the various forms their participation took, the documentary biases inherent in the sources, and contemporary methodological issues. It is part of the broader field of the history of women in science and of the study of the gendered construction of knowledge.

An emerging field of research

While historiography has taken an interest in women in science since before the 1970s, and while the history of women and travel has been regularly explored, their role in cartography and their interest in maps only began to be studied around the turn of the 2000s, nearly thirty years later. This pioneering work emerged mainly in the English-speaking world (Shefrin, 1999; Hudson, Ritzlin, 2000; Dando, 2018, 2024; Tyner, 1997; 1999; 2001) and in Italy (Rossi, 2005). Christine Petto’s survey article “Women and Cartography” (2020) opened up more avenues than it closed.

This historiographical lag is even more pronounced in French scholarship. While French research has taken an interest in women cartographers of the 20th century (Robic, 1997, 2009), as well as in the important role they played in research institutions and libraries (Ginsburger, 2015; Ginsburger, Robic, 2017; Antonutti, 2020), studies of their place in the construction of cartographic knowledge before the 20th century remain too rare.

A systemic invisibilisation

As in other scientific fields, several factors combine to render women’s involvement in geography and cartography invisible. Women are difficult to trace in the archives because of their limited legal existence. Conventions of the time denied their competence or consigned them to anonymity out of modesty. Their identity dissolves into initials in place of a full name, or into the designation “widow,” which presents them as mere continuators of their husband’s work.

Women are also excluded from the historiography of authorial recognition in cartography because of a paradoxical requirement: complete mastery of the full range of skills involved in cartographic production (intellectual design, drawing, engraving). Yet almost no geographer possesses such total mastery, since cartographic production is, by its very nature, collaborative work. Thus, when a woman conceives a map intellectually without engraving it herself (the Carte de Tendre by Madeleine de Scudéry), present-day critics attribute authorship to the male engraver (François Chauveau). Conversely, women engravers are confined to the status of mere executants.

RESEARCH THEMES

Theme 1 – Trajectories and output of women cartographers

The conference will focus on women cartographers by:

  • Tracing individual trajectories, without setting aside the role of widows in the continuity of family workshops, which deserves particular attention. While widows generally ran their late husband’s workshop for only a limited period (Barker, 1997, pp. 90–92), there are several notable exceptions, such as Mary Senex, who ran the workshop for fifteen years after her husband’s death, as did Marie Desmaretz, widow of Duval, Geneviève Hourlier, widow of Antoine de Fer, and Marie Darbisse, widow of Guillaume Delisle, to name just a few examples.
  • Establishing the conditions of access to cartographic practice and the professional and family networks drawn upon.
  • Examining the possible specificities of their output: a preference for certain cartographic forms such as allegorical or thematic maps (Carte de Tendre, the map by Marie Le Masson Le Golft, the work of the astronomer Nicole-Reine Lepaute), or “informal” maps produced in a playful or educational context.

Theme 2 – The “little hands” of cartography

Following the recent work of Françoise Waquet (2015, 2022) on the “little hands” of science, and of Delphine Gardey on women’s clerical work (2001), this conference could be an occasion to bring to light the largely unexplored, invisible work of women: informants, copyists, draughtswomen, engravers, illuminators, secretaries, and workshop hands. This effort has already been made for the first half of the 20th century (Swab, 2025), but it could equally be pursued for earlier periods, since women can sometimes be identified in depictions of workshops.

Theme 3 – Women readers and the reception of maps

The question of women as readers of maps — whether elite women, schoolmistresses, booksellers, schoolgirls, or students — opens up a particularly fertile field of investigation. On what occasions did these women encounter maps? On what media? And through what modes of reading?

This question also raises the issue of education, since reading a map presupposes prior training, and thus invites attention to the full range of women’s educational practices connected with maps. 

Finally, Christine Petto also points to periodicals and advertising aimed at women, as well as playful uses of maps: games, novels, embroidered maps, among other forms of appropriation. As an example, the map of Île de France (present-day Mauritius) included in the novel Paul et Virginie by Bernardin de Saint-Pierre, a major publishing success of the late 18th century with a largely female readership, illustrates this still under-explored dimension of the reception of maps.

By adopting a broad chronological framework, from the Middle Ages to the 20th century, the conference is open to all geographical areas. It is aimed at researchers in history, history of science, art history, literature, geography, and related disciplines.

PRACTICAL INFORMATION

Abstracts of c. 300 words, together with a short biographical note, should be submitted by 30 September 2026 to the following address: lucile.haguet@lehavre.fr

The selection committee will meet in early October and will announce the results of the call for papers no later than the second half of October.

The conference will take place on 12–13 March 2027 at Université Le Havre Normandie. A presentation of the heritage collections of the Le Havre municipal library is also planned.

Selected papers will be considered for publication in an issue of the journal of the Comité français de cartographie, Cartes & Géomatique, during 2028.

WORKS CITED AND SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY

Antonutti, Isabelle (ed.). 2020. Figures de bibliothécaires. Villeurbanne: Presses de l’Enssib, series “Papiers.” (see entry for Myriam Foncin)

Baigent, Elizabeth. 2025. “‘Octavia Always Enjoyed a Map’: Octavia Hill, Maps, and Victorian Women Reformers.” The Cartographic Journal 62 (3–4): 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2025.2627791

Barker, Hannah. 1997. “Women, Work and the Industrial Revolution: Female Involvement in the English Printing Trades, c. 1700–1840.” In Gender in Eighteenth-Century England: Roles, Representations and Responsibilities, ed. Hannah Barker and Elaine Chalus, 81–100. London: Longman.

Costa, Shelley. 2002. “The Ladies’ Diary: Gender, Mathematics, and Civil Society in Early-Eighteenth-Century England.” Osiris, 2nd series, 17: 49–73.

Dando, Christine E. 2018. Women and Cartography in the Progressive Era. London/New York: Routledge, series “Studies in Historical Geography.” New edition in 2024.

Findlen, Paula. 1995. “Translating the New Science: Women and the Circulation of Knowledge in Enlightenment Italy.” Configurations 3: 167–206.

Gardey, Delphine. 2001. La Dactylographe et l’expéditionnaire. Histoire des employés de bureau, 1890–1930. Paris: Belin, series “Modernités.”

Ginsburger, Nicolas. 2015. “Les premières géographes universitaires en France: enquête sur les débuts d’une féminisation disciplinaire (1913–1928).” Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography.

Ginsburger, Nicolas, and Marie-Claire Robic. 2017. “Portrait en groupe de femmes-géographes. La féminisation du champ disciplinaire au milieu du XXe siècle, entre effets de contexte et de structure (1938–1960).” Annales de géographie, 2017/1.

Hudson, Alice C., and Mary McMichael Ritzlin. 2000. “Preliminary Checklist of Pre-Twentieth-Century Women in Cartography.” Cartographica 37 (3): 3–24.

Longchamps, Denis. 2014. “Political Tourism: Elizabeth Simcoe’s Maps and Views of Canada (1791–1796).” Imago Mundi 66: 213–223.

Pastoureau, Mireille. 1984. Les atlas français, XVIe–XVIIe siècles: répertoire bibliographique et étude. Paris: Bibliothèque nationale, Département des cartes et plans.

Pedley, Mary Sponberg. 1979. “The Subscription List of the 1757 Atlas Universel: A Study in Cartographic Dissemination.” Imago Mundi 31: 66–77.

Petto, Christine M. 2009. “Playing the Feminine Card: Women of the Early Modern Map Trade.” Cartographica 44 (2): 67–81.

Petto, Christine M. 2020. Women and Enlightenment: Women as Producers and Consumers of Maps, 1650–1800. History of Cartography, vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Robic, Marie-Claire. 1997. “Exclusion, régression… Du ‘Ladies’ Program’ au ‘sans femme’?” Strates: Matériaux pour la recherche en sciences sociales, n° 9.

Robic, Marie-Claire. 2009. “Beaujeu-Garnier, J.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, ed. Rob Kitchin and Nigel Thrift, 275–276. Elsevier.

Rossi, Luisa. 2005. L’altra mappa. Esploratrici, viaggiatrici, geografe. Reggio Emilia: Diabasis, 351 p.

Shefrin, Jill. 1999. “‘Make it a Pleasure and Not a Task’: Educational Games for Children in Georgian England.” Princeton University Library Chronicle 60: 251–275.

Shevelow, Kathryn. 1989. Women and Print Culture: The Construction of Femininity in the Early Periodical. London: Routledge.

Skedd, Susan. 1997. “Women Teachers and the Expansion of Girls’ Schooling in England, c. 1760–1820.” In Gender in Eighteenth-Century England: Roles, Representations and Responsibilities, ed. Hannah Barker and Elaine Chalus, 101–125. London: Longman.

Swab, Jack. 2025. “Beyond ‘Clerical Cartography’: Gender and the (Re)Production of Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.” The Cartographic Journal 62 (3–4): 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2025.2627789

Tyacke, Sarah. 1978. London Map-Sellers, 1660–1720: A Collection of Advertisements for Maps Placed in the London Gazette, 1668–1719, with Biographical Notes on the Map-Sellers. Tring: Map Collector Publications.

Tyner, Judith A. 1997. “The Hidden Cartographers: Women in Mapmaking.” Mercator’s World 2 (6): 46–51.

Tyner, Judith A. 1999. “Millie the Mapper and Beyond: The Role of Women in Cartography since World War II.” Meridian 15: 23–28.

Tyner, Judith A. 2001. “Following the Thread: The Origins and Diffusion of Embroidered Maps.” Mercator’s World 6 (2): 36–41.

Waquet, Françoise. 2015. L’Ordre matériel du savoir. Comment les savants travaillent, XVIe-XXIe siècle. Paris: CNRS Éditions (repr. series “Biblis,” 2022).

Waquet, Françoise. 2022. Dans les coulisses de la science. Techniciens, petites mains et autres travailleurs invisibles. Paris: CNRS Éditions, series “Histoire,” 347 p.

White, Cynthia L. 1970. Women’s Magazines, 1693–1968. London: Michael Joseph.

Contact Information

Lucile Haguet, librarian at the Bibliothèque municipale du Havre, lucile.haguet@lehavre.fr

Catherine Hofmann, map curator at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, catherine.hofmann@bnf.fr

Contact Email

catherine.hofmann@bnf.fr

URL

https://cartogallica.hypotheses.org